nonethefewer: (Default)

I've recently come to the realization that one of the tools an abuser used against me (and everyone in his vicinity) was saying "un-PC" and offensive shit all the damn time, claiming it was "just a joke" or that he "just liked to get people riled up over (so-called) nothing." This is ultimately a control game. It's called: I'm Going To Keep You On The Defensive/Reactive At All Times, While I Get To Play Offensive/Active And Have A Real Laugh At Your Expense.

- ljusertupelo_lights, here

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

This is a comment I made in ljusermousme's post On Explaining Privilege.  I'm copying it here because I like it and want to save it.


For this, I am coming from a feminist standpoint.  Yay analogies.

For every one genuine good faith question about feminist-related stuff, I get:

* accusations that I'm overreacting (it's just a joke, it's just a word, you're such a feminazi, &c &c &c)
* people asking me basic fucking shit over and over as though I'm their personal goddamn feminist library and their fingers and brains are broken
* tone pissiness ("You were exasperated with me when I said that omg men get raped too as though you weren't aware – this has put me off feminism, I hope you're happy!" – god, I wish I were exaggerating)
* outright dismissal ("I can't trust your word on your experiences, because you're not objective enough.")

Not to mention my personal utter dislike of people asking me basic fucking questions that they could've looked up bloody anywhere.  I have never liked these regardless of the topic, because it shrieks to me that someone is expecting me to do the work for them.  "How many reported rapes have there been in the US?"  Google it.  Google it!  It's right there!

Q: Well, I'd argue better, except I don't know how many reported rapes there are in the US.
X: Argle, here.  Ten seconds in Google.

Also, I can't just, yknow, stop hearing stupid questions.  I get basic-ass questions at work (I do tech support), but if they truly drive me batty, I can quit my job, or take a vacation.  I can't quit being female in a sexist society.  So it's not like "X, you keep going to $place and you keep getting these questions, so stop going!".  If I wanted to stop getting feminist questions, I'd have to not talk about being a feminist.  If I wanted to stop being pissed off about sexism, I would have to never interact with another human being by any means, including any media and potentially clothing.

To wrap this up, every day I live in a society that is sexist as hell and doesn't… particularly care for women.  And I'm a woman.  It sucks rancid dog droppings that people don't understand and usually don't care to.  Further, they can get away with it, because society is set up to not have to give a shit about women.  (Which to me is what privilege is – the society-approved ability to not have to care about what a minority is going through.)  So I start out tired.

And then someone asks me, "Could you explain this 'feminism' thing to me?"

I am only human.  I try really hard to be as patient as I can, and to give the asker the benefit of the doubt.  But sometimes I would kind of, maybe, a little bit prefer that people shut the fuck up and do some goddamn reading up on the subject before they come to me and ask me to, on top of dealing with this woman-hating culture as a woman and a feminist, do some more work for them.

It's not a perfect analogy  – as one example, being female doesn't necessarily mean one is a feminist, whereas a PoC is a PoC (tautologically enough) – but it's certainly close enough to understand where PoC are coming from.

So while I might advise one to disengage from the internet if they're about to keel over from too-high blood pressure (I recommend this for just about anyone, and should do so myself more often), I can completely understand where PoC would get upset by yet more questions.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

* Via ljusershangy_feminismMore Than Just A Whore: Sex Work, Firefly and Audience Engagement

On how presenting Inara from Firefly in a positive light reinforces existing stereotypes about sex workers.

* Via ljuserlivinglaurelThe original Dollhouse pilot episode script.

* ilyka writes on how Being Intelligent gets in the damn way sometimes.  I could be mischaracterising her entry, it's been known, but that's part of what I got from it.

The problem I have with some, quite obviously not all (but you've got to put this disqualifier in there allthefuckingtime lest ye hurt feelings), educated people, is that the one thing they seem not to have been educated to do is to discern when to shut up and listen.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

Things that have made me sit up and take notes.

  1. Spinster aunt eradicates male viewpoint at I Blame The Patriarchy:

    Hear me, O afflicted dudes: If you truly do "get" feminism, you know that, like all oppressed classes, women, as a matter of survival, are intimate to the point of exhaustion with the drives, appetites, illnesses, angsts, yearnings, hopes, dreams, great works, and bodily functions of the oppressor. We grasp these things utterly and without omission because we do not live in a cave; they are the default subjects of all art, literature, music, science, film, blogs, dinner conversation, science fiction, advertising, journalism, legislation, TV, the Internet, religion, technology, sport, and miscellaneous culture both low and high. The minute some dude tells me something I don't already know about dudeliness, I'll eat a bonobo.

  2. ljuserthe_red_shoes reviews Dollhouse – be sure to read the comments.  I didn't much want to watch it even before I read reviews.
  3. Why sleep with a boy? Oh goodness, see the comments again.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

ljuserkarnythia has a post up about domestic abuse, with regards to the recent Chris Brown/Rihanna news.  Please read the comments as well, they are fantastic.  Also check out ljuserhotcoffeems's comment on domestic abuse:

And every single damn time someone tries to come up with some Special Circumstance that makes the situation under discussion possibly different. Well, guess what? 999 times out of 1000, it is not different, in any way shape or form. It's like idiots who tell you not to wear a seat belt because someone they know would have been killed if they'd been wearing one. Well, gee, guess that means we should never wear one, right? Every time people seek to make some kind of exception, in the interest of "fairness," they give just a little bit of license to this mess, make it likely that yet another abuser is going to go to the woman's friends in the interest of drumming up sympathy for himself in dealing with this "unbalanced" woman, because he knows people will go for it.

Pass it on.

[eta] And if you have a Facebook account, please log in and report this group.  When you go to that page, go all the way to the bottom and click Report Group.

(The test is to see if this RSSupplement plugin works.  I want to add "Please comment on the entry over here" to posts that've been RSSified.)

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

#1: Jessica Lenahan

At Feministing, Ann writes about Jessica Lenahan and Castle Rock v. Gonzalez. In essence, Lenahan had a restraining order against her estranged husband, Simon Gonzalez. He violated the restraining order, kidnapped their three young children, killed them, then… I don't know what was in his head, but he opened fire on the police station and was killed.

She took this as far as the Supreme Court, who told her that it's not Colorado law enforcement's job to enforce restraining orders, sorry. So she's taking this to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

I wish her all the luck in this. And I wish we had something better than restraining orders.

#2: Shadayra Kilfoy-Flores

Via Livejournal, ginmar posts about Shadayra Kilfoy-Flores and her incompetent assistant DA. The things that are disgusting include (but are not limited to):

* The domestic violence itself.
* The plea bargain, that dropped the potential sentencing from over 11 years to 18 months.
* The fact that burglary has a larger sentence than "substantial battery".

Contact information for DA Brian Blanchard:

Dane County Courthouse Room 3000
215 S Hamilton St
Madison, WI 53703-3297
Tel / TTY: (608) 266-4211
Email: blanchard.brian@mail.da.state.wi.us

I'm composing an email now, and may post it once I'm done.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

naamah_darling writes about cynicism:

I am a pretty realistic person. I know that the world is a shitty place. Downright horrible. But I don't accept that it has to stay that way, and people who roll their eyes and puff diffidently and wave their hands and say "I don't know why that surprises you!" or "Well, that's just how those people think!" or "There's really not anything you can do!" fucking piss me off.

Usually I am cynical because I am overwhelmed.  I read about how this is sucking and that is sucking, and I don't know what I can do.  Being cynical is one part realism (as though it's news that people can be right assholes) and two parts defensiveness – "Don't get me involved in this, because there is no end to it and that is pre-overwhelming."

Which is… um.  Crap, honestly.  What matters isn't winning, what matters is trying.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

naamah_darling at Livejournal writes:

In 1999, a woman in Florida attempting to give birth privately in her own home was taken into custody by a sheriff, restrained by force, and delivered to a hospital where, while in labor, she was forced to defend her decision. The hospital sought an emergency court order to force her to undergo a caesarian delivery, and they won. I didn't hear about it until recently, but I have to say, I'm fucking appalled.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

Via a friend: A Visual History of Feminism Via Pop Culture: Vids, Comics, and TV, as compiled by [info]kali921.

(Should be SFW, unless your workplace has a problem with comic book women.)

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

Via bbbsg on LJ – If babies were all considered disabled:

Glossing over labor and delivery, let's consider what happens when you've got a baby. It can't walk! It can't eat food! It's disabled, poor thing. It needs special nutritional supplements that can only be prescribed by a doctor. It also needs a special device called a stroller which costs maybe five or ten thousand dollars. You'd apply through Medicare to get one. Maybe they won't approve one for use outside the home! There's stroller stores, especially online, but wow, would you buy a Bugaboo stroller that cost $5000 without getting to see it first and whether it would be good for your situation, or would fit in your car or whether you could lift it up? By the time your prescription for the "stroller" had been approved by doctors and you'd proved through several insurance company and social worker home visits that you indeed had a baby, and by the time the stroller arrived, your baby could walk. Oh, you could rent a basic stroller from a medical supply store for 10 bucks a day, but it would be MADE OF LEAD.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

Today's awesome quote:

This guy reminds me of a certain type I've run into, the sort who think that they are "independent thinkers" and "dispassionately logical", holding themselves up as paragons of logic and reason. What this really means is, if you actually CARE about something, they count that as a point against you, because you're being "emotional", and thus couldn't possibly be right about anything.

He's got all the signs, like the Latin motto for his LJ, his title of "The Honorable Hammer of Courteous Debate", and of course, his arguments based solely on "balance" and "emotional reporting". This type always, I've noticed, blames victims. Always. They seem to have an instinct for siding with the powerful whenever there's a conflict, and always justifying this by noting that the people in power don't get all emotional about things.

- flewellyn

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

TroubleInChina asks, what about the men?

One of my greatest frustrations with internet discussions about Feminism and Feminist Issues is the response of "But what about the men?" The reason this response bothers me is not because I don't think there can and should be discussions about how various issues affect men, or how the gender roles in society affect men, but because very very rarely is the response an actual invitation to discussion. It's come up a few times here, I've responded a couple of times with "Why don't you write about it? I'll link!" and yet, there's been no great discussion posts about these issues brought to my attention by the people who bring them up.

That makes me sad. My choosing to write about women isn't because I don't care about men, but because I'm writing about women. But I do care about men, so let's seriously talk about how the system and its current gender roles do affect men.

This solidified two things for me, that had been wufting about in my brain for ages:

1) Feminism isn't against men, you ninnies, it's against the patriarchy.  That patriarchy that hurts men, as well.  So when someone (who isn't this poster, I mean) says "Well but so, what about the men?", it comes off like they're not paying the slightest bit of attention to what feminism deals with.

2) All of what TIC said.  If you want to see it written about, write about it.

Anyways.  That there is a good link, and you should be following it.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

Today's post that is filled with the awesome is over in LJ, by naamah_darling, wherein which she takes on abortion, responsibility, and the myth of the slutty-slut-slut who has drive-thru abortions every Tuesday.

Go ye forth and read!

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

I wanted to worry that I'm using this journal just as a repository for links… but then I stopped.  Because they're good goddamn links.

First, the fat-related links.

* [LJ] A friend sent me this link, about what being fat means to this one woman.

I take pleasure. I don't exist for the pleasure of others, I don't deny myself pleasure to please anybody. I give pleasure, when it pleases me to do so, but I am not taken. When a lover said, "Wow, I can't believe you let me do that to you, and I didn't even have to buy you jewelry," I snapped, "I didn't let you do that to me. I made you do that to me." When I'm hungry, I eat; if it's in public, it's not a performance of ordering half-helpings and the sauce on the side to show off that feminine denial of desire. I eat what I want. I eat like a man. And it's fucking ridiculous that eating is gendered in this culture, but it's a fucking ridiculous culture, okay?

I am a mover. I am not moved.

I am an agent. I am not an object.

* She who sent me the previous link runs The Rotund, a "Body Acceptance and Politics Blog".  I absolutely highly recommend this blog.

* Junk Food Science – a terrific blog about "the truth about food, fat and health".

Next, a feminism-related link.

* At Pandagon, Chris Clarke writes How not to be an asshole: a guide for men.  I can't single out a line or three that I love; I love it all.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

Page generated Aug. 9th, 2025 06:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios