nonethefewer: (Default)

The very next time anyone even jokes about "feminazis", or how women hate men, I'm going to put my motherfucking fist through the wall.

At Feministing, Jessica posts about Natasha Hall's murder by her ex-boyfriend.  Notably, the police allegedly said that if she kept calling them wrt her ex, they would arrest the both of them.  What the shit.

In comments, one MedicalStudent29 (oh god, he's my age) really wants to know why Hill didn't do everything in her power to prevent this:

The anti-stalking laws are there, but they only work if the female victims actually choose to exercise their rights to file charges. Far too often, they still dont understand the gravity of the situation.

Aghghghg.  People tried arguing with him.  I tried arguing with him.  And then a different commenter responds with this utter tripe:

He's probably going to go to prison for many years to come. She's still dead. As a doornail. All the blame spared her and heaped upon him will not give her another breath of life.

At which point, I stopped being able to see any colour other than red.

I can't stand it.  I can't stand it, that this is the world I live in.  That this world, that has sunsets and laughter and wine, also has shitstains on society who, without irony, state that gosh, we shouldn't punish people for their crimes, for the crime has already been committed, it's in the past, lighten up!

And sometimes I actually wonder why I don't leave the house unless I have to.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

Somehow, the subject of feminism came up yesterday when I was chatting with B, my live-in partner.  (That makes him sound like a sofa-bed.)  He asserted, partially tongue-in-cheekily, that the world is run by a small group of rich white men, and he's not one of them.  There's The Top Of The Pack, and then waaay later on the power scale, there's men, women, non-whites, and so forth.

Somehow, this turned into me ranting about rape.  I broke it down to chat style for ease of reading.

X: Recently, there was an item in the news wherein which a woman who was throwing up due to being so drunk was prevented from leaving the building and was gang-raped.  The responses to this were normal – "She probably deserved it.  She got herself drunk.  She got herself raped.  Oh, those poor boys!"

X: Like the Duke lacrosse thing – a bunch of frat boys hired a prostitute for their kegger, she files rape charges, and all anyone can talk about, aside from at the feminist blogs I read, is oh, those poor boys!  Meanwhile, her personal information – her full name and a picture of her – is plastered in the media.

X: And what other crimes are there (crimes that involve two people, I mean, a victim and a perp) where the victim is told that they were probably lying, or they were asking for it, and oh those poor perps?  I mean, if we left our front door open and we were robbed, we'd be called fucking stupid, but we still would have been robbed.  It's still a crime.

X: FURthermore, about the lying part, you know what the stats are for "those crazy bitches" lying about rape?  The same as any other two-party crime.  In the same range, anyways.  But oh, those lying bitches.

X: And where is this coming from?

B: … I hope you don't expect me to answer that.

X: I think that was rhetorical.

* Rape — Sexual Assault at the US DoJ's Office for Victims of Crimes site.

* Sailorman at Alas, A Blog has a neat breakdown of types of rape charges.

* Of course, when the victim in question is male, rape is suddenly a traumatic event.  To quote a commenter, "Afterall, rape of a man is a terrible, traumatic crime. Rape of a woman/gay man/child is your average Tuesday."

* That item in the news I mentioned.

* And to end this on a really terrible note, from London: "A teenage girl who claims she was gang raped by three 13-year-old schoolboys was overweight and would have been "glad of the attention", a barrister told a jury."

Okay, I can't end there.  Check out the cutest kitten in the world.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

I'm dubious about the idea of reading copious amounts of feminist literature when PMSing hard.  I'm also a bit annoyed with myself for using the phrase "PMSing hard" ever, but today it is true.  Oh well.

Mostly, after a day of reading almost nothing but feminist stuff (apart from email, LJ, and SQL help forums), I find that I'm a huge mix of frothy rage and conflicting feelings.

The rage manifests itself in all sorts of ways.  I want to spend a year only experiencing female artists.  I want to become a full-on lesbian and never again let a man within twenty feet of me.  I want to replace everything I own with equivalent woman-made items.  I want to set people on fire for ever suggesting ever ever that a rape is the woman's fault ever.

Yesterday, I passed a guy on the way home from the store who called me a bitch because I didn't respond to his "Hello!".  I didn't hear him – I was, in fact, reading my book – until a split second before he got vituperative.  (Tasty delayed hearing.)  When I was in NY with my boyfriend for my girlfriend's wedding, I got catcalled when walking around the neighborhood near our hotel, and yelled at when I didn't respond positively.  I ended up having a conversation with a nearby male pedestrian, who explained that they were only being friendly.  I didn't have the time or the inclination to get into it, but my two responses to that sort of thing are:

1) In what fucking universe is shouting dirty things about my body considered "being friendly"?
2) Why do they feel entitled to my attention?  Why is it an expected thing that I should respond?

And I want to do something to express my feelings about the fact that men will never understand what that feels like.  It feels like my purpose in life is to be on display for men, is what it fucking feels like.  What's worse is when the occasional man will get pissy with me about feeling unsafe around men: "It's rude of you to assume that Joe Random might be a danger to you!"  I used to argue with said men, but nowadays, I'm more inclined to say, "If you listened to women for a half-second, you'd know precisely why we feel this way.  So fuck off."

In a world where a staggering percentage of rapists are men, where all harassers I've ever encountered are men, I'm just not that interested in feeling sorry for them.

The worst part about all this is that I don't feel hatred, I feel incredibly sad.  When someone says "Don't tempt men by wearing a short skirt!" (or idiocies to that effect), I'm angry that people actually think that, damn straight, but I'm also sad that the speaker holds men in such low regard.  I don't think that most "But men are dogs!  You should know better than to tempt them/trust them/come within 50 yards of them!" people realise that what they're doing is vastly insulting men.  They're essentially calling them incapable of being civilised.  And yet, feminists are the man-haters.  It's fucking terrible.

(Of course, then there's the irony that the people who spout the "Don't tempt them!" garbage are usually also the ones to get upset that women feel unsafe around men.  Mmhmm.)

The silliest thing makes me sad, though – I read a lot of science fiction, and a decent chunk of that is about first contact situations.  The thought that always runs through my head when reading these stories is, "Half of our species routinely ignores, oppresses, rapes, and kills the other half just because of our gender, and we think someone else would want to talk to us??  Fuck!"

Assume generalisations where you feel it's necessary to do so.  It's a rant, I'm not always interested in being meticulous in my most/some/not all language.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

nonethefewer: (Default)

Elsenbloggen, I read something that, stupidly, made this one argument click in my head.  I say "stupidly" because it's one of those "It's so obvious!" realisations.

The rapists are at fault.

"But what if the woman hadn't–"

No.  Stop.  Wrong.  The rapists are at fault.

One effect of arguments that focus on what the women should or should not have done is to put the rapists in the category of "Natural Disaster".  "You should've worn more clothing, not gone out after 6p, worn your hair up/down/sideways/long/short, or used safewords, you terrible person!"  (Trigger warning, there.)  Because of course, a rape happens.  Like lightning, you know.

Christ.

No more "But I was just being practical*!".  No more veiled she-was-asking-for-it bullshit.  No more "Men get raped too!" (said as a distractive, not contributive, thing).  No more restrictions or chastisements or "Let's just hear his side of the story first" or "She's probably just lying, you know".  I have officially stopped giving a damn.

And I am all about being practical, is the fun part.  I'm all about finding the way that works, regardless of how it should work.  I'm also all about seeing the other person's point of view.  But you know what?  I'm done with it, on this issue.

Hi!  When a rape occurs, it is 100% the rapist's fault.  I don't care if the victim was a crack-addled butt-naked college student doing a dance on a library table.  The rapist is at fault.  Stop focusing on what that one woman did "wrong", you ignorant fucks, and start focusing on what we as a society are doing that's so wrong that not only is rape ever ever possible, it's this widely excused.

And that's my angry outburst for this evening.  Thank you.

* I'm all for being prudent, but there's a difference between "What to do until we get this problem fixed" and "What to do because gosh, it's like stopping the sun from coming up!", and most people's being practical feels an awful lot like the latter.

Originally posted at Xtinian Thoughts.  Comment here or there.

Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 11:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios